Your forum username:
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up


    Welcome to Sky User - The Unofficial Support Forum for everything Sky! - Proudly helping over 65k members.


    Advertisement

    Results 1 to 3 of 3

    UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming

    This is a discussion on UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming within the Everyday Life forums, part of the Community channel category; UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming - ISPreview UK The United Kingdom’s primary four Mobile ...

    1. #1
      Scubbie's Avatar
      Scubbie is offline Sky User Moderator
      Exchange: 02392
      Broadband ISP: Sky Fibre Unlimited
      Router: Sky Q Hub ER110
      Sky TV: Sky+HD box
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      Near Portsmouth
      Posts
      28,200
      Thanks
      842
      Thanked 2,223 Times in 2,092 Posts

      UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming

      UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming - ISPreview UK
      The United Kingdom’s primary four Mobile Network Operators (MNO), including EE, Vodafone, O2 and Three UK, are preparing to make a counter proposal to the Government’s demand for a national roaming policy that would see investment boosted in order to build new masts and improve coverage.

      The telecoms regulator, Ofcom, currently reports that around 99% of the United Kingdom’s population can already receive both 2G and 3G based outdoor mobile network coverage from at least one operator. But this falls to 73%+ for 4G, although even that will reach a similar level by the end of 2015.

      But such figures only present part of the picture because in geographical (landmass) terms even basic mobile connectivity can only reach around 80% coverage, which leaves plenty of so-called “partial notspots” in-between. The Government wants to solve this by effectively forcing operators to improve 2G mobile reception in related areas (i.e. mostly rural locations) through greater sharing of key infrastructure, such as masts (details).

      However the Mobile Operators Association warned in September 2014 that such an approach would be “Unworkable … national roaming isn’t the silver bullet that is being suggested. It will take years to implement and will not address the problem of notspots. National roaming would be a disincentive to build more infrastructure. And it is technically difficult and expensive to set up national roaming, and customers would face more dropped calls.”

      Never the less the Government think they’re on to a vote winner, thus any arguably legitimate complaints from mobile operators about rivals getting a free ride from their respective investments and thus discouraging future upgrades are likely to be overlooked. On top of that they’re all facing a huge licence fee hike (here), which seems at least partly intended to off-set against lower than expected 4G auction revenues (here).

      So it’s little wonder that the big four have decided to produce a counter proposal, which according to The Telegraph would see them investing millions of pounds to boost predominantly rural coverage and eliminate “partial notspots“. Apparently this would push the geographic coverage up to around 89%, although we assume this would still only help basic 2G connectivity and that’s no good for data (we need it for at least 3G / Mobile Broadband too).

      An industry source said:


      The consultation gave us a good look at what they really want and we think what we’re going to propose roughly matches the benefits they say national roaming would have without the problems. We’re optimistic the Government will be happy with it.”

      However it’s also reported that the operators will seek a reduction in the proposed licence fee hike as a concession from the Government. Sadly we don’t have a clear idea of the sums involved in the offer itself and so it’s difficult to know how everything would balance out. In addition, operators will want to build taller masts that can cover a wider area and this would require another relaxation in the existing planning rules; easier said than done.

      It’s important not to forget that the existing £150 million Mobile Infrastructure Project (MIP) is separately working with Arqiva to build new masts at various points around the United Kingdom, which hopes to resolve some of the country’s worst notspots and will benefit around 60,000 premises. But no doubt some gaps will always remain.

      The Government’s snap National Roaming consultation is currently open for responses until 26th November 2014 and we suspect that its rushed nature is at least partly due to the approaching General Election. Below we’ve attached a useful image of the currently predicted geographic coverage of UK mobile networks, albeit only via 3G (dark blue) and 4G (light green).

      <Coverage maps of the UK for each provider>


    2. Advertisement
    3. #2
      James_Mitchell's Avatar
      James_Mitchell is offline Sky User Member
      Exchange:
      Broadband ISP: Sky Fibre Unlimited Max
      Router: Sky Q Hub
      Sky TV: Sky+HD box
      Join Date
      Jan 2011
      Posts
      756
      Thanks
      43
      Thanked 50 Times in 47 Posts

      Re: UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming

      A very confusing article as it's talking about 2G roaming yet it's showing 3G/4G coverage maps of each network?

      What OFCOM should be doing to help this is forcing mobile networks to use all their allocated spectrum as there's at least 1 UK mobile network that is just sitting on quite a large amount of unused mobile spectrum they own but do not use. It should a case of use it or loose it.

    4. #3
      Scubbie's Avatar
      Scubbie is offline Sky User Moderator
      Exchange: 02392
      Broadband ISP: Sky Fibre Unlimited
      Router: Sky Q Hub ER110
      Sky TV: Sky+HD box
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      Near Portsmouth
      Posts
      28,200
      Thanks
      842
      Thanked 2,223 Times in 2,092 Posts

      Re: UK Mobile Operators in Counter Proposal to Stop National 2G Roaming

      They are all guilty of leaving blank spots around the country in some specific areas, but some definitely appear to have done a better job than others.

      Yes the article alludes to 2G coverage for calls, which 3G can do too. Yet the maps are just for 3G and 4G as you have correctly stated.

      Since the EU will require them all to provide roaming across the whole of Europe from November next year at the same rate as you would in the UK for both call and data plans, I can't see what is holding them back.

      Several years ago it was proposed that all new transmitter towers would be made to hold kit for each of them, yet we still have areas where none of them want to set anything up or where they haven't managed to accommodate local environmental conditions.

      Areas such as the Moors, Highlands and the Pennines where coverage is anything from non-existent to patchy at best would really benefit from having a good mobile network. Weak signals mean that phone batteries are drained faster. Since these remote areas are frequented all year round by walkers and climbers, a good signal is invaluable.

      Yes I know that FM Radio can be better, especially for the rescue teams. What mobiles can now provide is GPS location, two-way communication, video calls, photographs of where someone is (when there isn't any low cloud or fog of course) and even a bright light. Battery packs are more than able to keep a mobile running for days if required, so they can be an essential tool.

      Sky Fibre Unlimited Pro: Connected at 80,000 kbps / 20,000 kbps
      Previous ADSL2+ Speed 19999 kbps 1153 kbps, Line Attenuation 17.5 db 6.9 db, Noise Margin 7.5 dB 8.7 dB
      Speedtest: 17.15MB/s 0.97Mb/s Ping 31 ms

     

     

    Tags for this Thread

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    SkyUser - Copyright © 2006-2020. SatDish and NewsreadeR | SkyUser is in no way affiliated with Sky Broadband / BSkyB
    RIPA NOTICE: NO CONSENT IS GIVEN FOR INTERCEPTION OF PAGE TRANSMISSION