ISPs Give Mixed Reaction to Start of Easier Broadband and Phone Switching
This is a discussion on ISPs Give Mixed Reaction to Start of Easier Broadband and Phone Switching within the General Computing and Internet forums, part of the Community channel category; ISPs Give Mixed Reaction to Start of Easier Broadband and Phone Switching - ISPreview UK The communications regulator will, after ...
- 15-06-15, 08:07 AM #1
ISPs Give Mixed Reaction to Start of Easier Broadband and Phone Switching
ISPs Give Mixed Reaction to Start of Easier Broadband and Phone Switching - ISPreview UK
The communications regulator will, after around five long years of development, later this week finally succeed in forcing the majority of fixed line broadband and phone providers across the United Kingdom to introduce a “simpler and more reliable” method of switching service. It should be good news, but not everybody is happy.
The new switching process, which is also known by the more technical and somewhat long-winded “Gaining Provider Led Notification of Transfer Plus” (GPL NoT+), essentially harmonises several of the old methods into a single solution that puts the power to switch into the hands of your new (gaining) ISP instead of the existing / old (losing) one.
In short this means that when you want to swap ISP it should just be a matter of contacting the new provider. We have already published a useful guide to explain exactly what’s changing, including some background on the situation, which you can read here: A Guide to Switching UK Broadband and Phone Provider After June 2015.
However the new system is far from perfect. For example, it currently only applies to ISPs that make use of BTOpenreach’s national telecoms and broadband platform (e.g. BT, Sky Broadband, TalkTalk etc.) and separately to any ISPs that operate off KC’s network in Hull.
Sadly Virgin Media’s cable platform, along with fixed wireless, satellite and true fibre optic (FTTP/H) providers, aren’t yet covered. Ofcom continue to work on this, but the low market penetration and or physically separate nature of these networks make it technically very difficult to achieve a cheap, simple and seamless transfer via GPL NoT+.
What the Providers Say
Broadly most providers have been lukewarm about the change and some clearly have concerns, such as with the additional cost of running the new system and the greater potential for SLAMMING (i.e. being swapped from one provider to another without the customer’s consent).
A TalkTalk Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:
“TalkTalk is committed to making Britain better off, and we have led led calls to make switching simpler for many years. We welcome Ofcom’s new rules, which are a step in the right direction, but we strongly believe they need to go further. An easier, single switching process is vital for a more competitive market, with consumers able to exercise choice and secure better value deals.
As more and more customers recognise the great value they get from quad play (fixed line phone, broadband, mobile and TV), we need to make sure that we have universal provider-led switching across all bundles so that people can move between suppliers quickly and easily.”Adrian Kennard, Director of AAISP (Andrews & Arnold), said:
“We are very concerned over not only slamming but mistakes, and so are our customers. Whether the notice is a letter or an email, it will be easy to miss and find a service is migrated. We are also rather annoyed that the process is now extended to 10 days.
If broadband was like gas or electricity supply, it would not matter as such issues would simply be a matter of billing and could be retrospectively corrected. The service itself would continue.
But broadband is not like these, or at least not always like these. A simple mistake of phone number on a migrate could see a dedicated leased line service between offices that happens to work over Ethernet over FTTC lines suddenly turn in to some Sky broadband or something, with 10 days needed to fix it. Even with a simple broadband service, someone could find their fixed IP service with servers on the end of it suddenly becomes some dynamic IP, no IPv6, CGNAT nightmare.
Several of our customers, small and large, have asked for “migration protection” type services where we auto-reject migrations for them.”A Gigaclear Spokeswoman told ISPreview.co.uk:
“Anything that improves the customer experience is of course a step in the right direction. We would like to see this opened up to the rest of the market to include the pure fibre as well as the cable providers so that the experience for all customers is seamless and hopefully consistent as today the experience can be extremely frustrating for some customers trying to migrate off the copper network.”Steve Holford, Hyperoptic’s VP of Revenue, added:
“Because Hyperoptic uses its own, dedicated infrastructure, rather than use old copper phone lines, there is no need to manage a migration between providers. The customer can simply cancel services from their current provider and move to Hyperoptic at a time that suits them. Many customers like to have Hyperoptic installed first to ensure there is no loss of connection and to experience the speeds of true fibre broadband – it’s a big difference!“Neil Watson, Head of Service at Entanet, said:
“I firmly believe that OFCOM have got it wrong this time. I feel the changes will make the migration process a lot slower and more open to abuse, plus there is little to no comprehension of the wholesale model. The changes will require everyone that supplies broadband to take action and to make significant changes to the way that they work.
We are also concerned that end users will be completely unaware that the process has changed and that it will take significantly longer to migrate their service. We feel it is an unnecessary change that will be detrimental to consumers – thereby flying in the face of OFCOM’s raison d’être.”Simon Davies, IDNet Boss, said:
“It is a backward step because it removes from the customer their proactive control of the migration process and reopens the door to slamming by requiring the customer to take reactive action to stop the process.”
Admittedly if somebody wanted to trigger a switch of service without your consent then they’d first need to have some basic private details (e.g. name, address, phone number etc.). The phone number is the most important one as this needs to match with the existing ISPs records, but all of these details are easy enough for a determined individual to find and then there’s always the risk of a mistake by the person inputting the data.
On top of that a second layer of protection means that both the new and existing ISPs would need to inform the customer (e.g. via email or post) about the change and at that point you have roughly 10 working days to stop the switch. But we all know how rubbish email reliability can be and if the letter never arrives or is missed then there’s always room for trouble.
The reality right now is that SLAMMING remains a very small problem for the industry and it’s too early to say whether the new switching system will change that, although the possibility does exist. In any case one provider, AAISP, is so concerned that it recently launched a free “anti-slamming” service (here).
Finally, another problem is the issue over how this process will help if it doesn’t also factor the other products in a quad-play bundle, specifically TV and mobile. Admittedly TV is less of a critical issue, but most consumers will want to keep their mobile number and having to deal with that separately is more of a hassle. But Ofcom are looking at this.
On the other hand we must not lose sight of the advantages that Ofcom’s system will bring by making it easier for consumers to escape a bad provider and simplifying the whole process by having a single harmonised approach. Just make sure you understand that switching, especially if you’re still under an existing contract term, could carry extra costs and a short period of downtime may still occur.